Sonnet 141

Love transcends reason and sense: the speaker's heart loves what his eyes, ears, and body reject.

Original

Modern

1 In faith I do not love thee with mine eyes,

Honestly, I don't love you for your appearance,

2 For they in thee a thousand errors note,

For my eyes see a thousand flaws in you,

3 But ’tis my heart that loves what they despise,

But it is my heart that loves what my eyes hate,

4 Who in despite of view is pleased to dote.

Which despite my sight is pleased to love you blindly.

5 Nor are mine ears with thy tongue’s tune delighted,

Nor are my ears delighted with your voice,

6 Nor tender feeling to base touches prone,

Nor is my tender feeling drawn to physical touch,

7 Nor taste, nor smell, desire to be invited

Neither my sense of taste nor my sense of smell seeks an invitation

8 To any sensual feast with thee alone:

To any sensual feast with you alone:

Volta The volta pivots from listing what the speaker does not love to declaring that none of this matters: his foolish heart overrides all rational protest.

9 But my five wits, nor my five senses can

volta: reason overridden by emotion

Yet my five senses and my five wits cannot

10 Dissuade one foolish heart from serving thee,

Stop this foolish heart from serving you,

11 Who leaves unswayed the likeness of a man,

Which abandons what makes me seem human,

12 Thy proud heart’s slave and vassal wretch to be:

To be slave and miserable servant to your proud heart:

13 Only my plague thus far I count my gain,

Only my suffering so far I count as my gain,

14 That she that makes me sin, awards me pain.

That she who makes me sin also awards me pain.

The Five Senses vs. the Five Wits

Shakespeare employs medieval and Renaissance psychology here. The 'five senses' (sight, hearing, touch, taste, smell) receive sensory data; the 'five wits' (common sense, imagination, fantasy, estimation, memory) process it. Yet neither layer of cognition can stop the heart's rebellion. This hierarchical collapse—reason defeated by emotion—was deeply troubling to Renaissance thought.

Paradox and Slavery

The speaker calls love a 'plague' yet 'counts [it] gain.' He is enslaved ('vassal wretch') yet somehow ennobled by suffering. This double bind runs through the Dark Lady sequence: to love her is to betray reason, yet to refuse love is to deny the heart's own truth. Suffering becomes the only 'reward.'

If this happened today

Like someone who keeps texting an ex despite knowing the relationship was toxic, the speaker's emotions override logic. His heart loves someone his whole sensory apparatus—and judgment—correctly identifies as flawed.

← Sonnet 140 All Sonnets Sonnet 142 →