Sonnet 75

The speaker describes his emotional attachment to the beloved as both sustenance and torment, oscillating between satiation and starvation.

Original
Modern
1 So are you to my thoughts as food to life,
You're as essential to my mind as food is to keeping me alive,
2 Or as sweet-seasoned showers are to the ground;
Or like sweet rain falling on dry earth,
3 And for the peace of you I hold such strife
And to be near you and have peace with you, I fight so hard,
'Peace' = possession, contentment. 'Strife' = struggle, conflict.
4 As ’twixt a miser and his wealth is found.
Like the desperate struggle between a miser and their money,
The miser loves wealth but fears losing it, so hoards obsessively.
5 Now proud as an enjoyer, and anon
Now I'm full of pride and satisfaction, enjoying you,
'Enjoyer' = one who is enjoying. 'Anon' = soon after, presently.
6 Doubting the filching age will steal his treasure,
But then I'm afraid time will steal you away from me,
'Filching age' = time personified as a thief. 'His treasure' = my beloved.
7 Now counting best to be with you alone,
Sometimes I think the greatest happiness is being with you in private,
8 Then bettered that the world may see my pleasure,
Then I think how nice it would be if everyone saw how happy I am,
'Bettered' = improved, preferable. The speaker swings between privacy and public display.
Volta The volta moves from metaphors of possession ('enjoyer') to paradoxes of desire, revealing that the speaker cannot achieve stable contentment regardless of whether they have access to the beloved.
9 Sometime all full with feasting on your sight,
Sometimes I'm completely satisfied just looking at you,
'Feasting' = consuming greedily.
10 And by and by clean starved for a look,
And then soon after I'm desperately hungry just for one glimpse,
'By and by' = soon after, immediately. 'Clean' = completely.
11 Possessing or pursuing no delight
Finding no joy either in having you or trying to get you,
12 Save what is had, or must from you be took.
Except for what you give me or what I can take from you,
'Took' = archaic past tense of 'take.'
13 Thus do I pine and surfeit day by day,
So I swing between hunger and overeating, wanting and having enough, every single day,
'Pine' = waste away, languish. 'Surfeit' = excess, overindulgence.
14 Or gluttoning on all, or all away.
Either gorging myself on everything about you, or having nothing at all.
'Gluttoning' = consuming greedily. 'All away' = everything vanished.
Oscillation as Structural Condition

Sonnet 75 presents obsessive love as a state of perpetual swing. The speaker cannot achieve equilibrium. The quatrains alternate between states ('proud...and anon,' 'Sometime...and by and by') and the couplet collapses these oscillations into a binary: 'all' or 'away.' There is no middle position, no contentment with moderate love. This reflects the psychological structure of anxious attachment: the beloved is simultaneously the solution and the threat. Possession brings anxiety (what if they leave?), and separation brings craving. The speaker is trapped in a feedback loop where neither satisfaction nor deprivation resolves the underlying insecurity. Love has become pathological.

Miser and Treasure: Possessiveness as Prison

The miser metaphor (line 4) is not incidental—it defines the speaker's entire relationship. The miser loves wealth but is enslaved by it. Similarly, the speaker's love for the beloved creates constant fear of loss. The beloved is 'treasure,' which makes them simultaneously precious and vulnerable to theft. By investing all emotional worth in one person, the speaker makes that person an obsession rather than a love. Lines 7-8 reveal this further: the question is not what makes the speaker happy but whether to hide the beloved or display them, whether to keep the 'treasure' private or public. The beloved has become an object of conquest and display, not mutual regard. The sonnet thus documents the corruption of love into possession.

If this happened today

A person who bases their entire emotional equilibrium on another. If the beloved is present and attentive, the speaker feels overfull; if absent or withdrawn, they feel starved. There's no middle ground. This is the pathology of anxious attachment: the other person becomes simultaneously all food and all threat, and the relationship oscillates between obsessive closeness and paranoid fear of abandonment. It's love as addiction, not reciprocal bond.