Sonnet 122

I've discarded the tables (writing tablets) you gave me because I've inscribed you into my brain and heart; these internal records surpass any physical memorial.

Original
Modern
1 Thy gift, thy tables, are within my brain
Your gift, your notebooks, are inside my mind
2 Full charactered with lasting memory,
Completely written with permanent memory
Wordplay: “full charactered with lasting memory”

Charactered means both 'engraved' (as on tablets) and 'written as characters'; memory is here a physical, inscribed thing.

3 Which shall above that idle rank remain
Which will surpass that worthless collection
4 Beyond all date even to eternity.
Beyond death, reaching even to eternity
5 Or at the least, so long as brain and heart
Or at minimum, while mind and heart continue functioning
6 Have faculty by nature to subsist,
Have the ability through nature to continue existing
7 Till each to razed oblivion yield his part
Until each surrenders to erased oblivion its part
8 Of thee, thy record never can be missed:
Your memory can never possibly be lost
Volta The volta shifts from claiming the brain supersedes physical gifts to defending the choice to give them away as an act of trust.
9 That poor retention could not so much hold,
Because poor notebooks couldn't hold so much anyway
10 Nor need I tallies thy dear love to score,
Nor do I need tally marks to keep score of your love
11 Therefore to give them from me was I bold,
So I was bold to give them back from me
12 To trust those tables that receive thee more:
To trust those notebooks to hold you even more
13 To keep an adjunct to remember thee
To keep a reminder of you
14 Were to import forgetfulness in me.
Would mean I'm importing forgetfulness into myself
Brain as Archive and Eternity

The speaker claims that the beloved's 'gift, thy tables, are within my brain / Full charactered with lasting memory.' The brain has become a writing surface, the beloved's image 'charactered' (engraved, written) upon it. This record shall 'above that idle rank remain / Beyond all date even to eternity.' The beloved is inscribed not in wax tablets but in the speaker's neural permanence—a medieval understanding of memory as physical engraving.

The Paradox of Giving Them Away

The couplet explains the apparent rejection: by giving away the physical tables, the speaker trusts them to 'those tables that receive thee more'—perhaps the speaker's own written words, or simply the beloved's continued existence. Giving them away becomes an act of confidence, not dismissal. The speaker needs no tally or retention aid; the beloved is so completely internalized that physical memory aids would be redundant, even an insult to the perfection of internal inscription.

If this happened today

Someone gave you a beautiful handwritten letter, and you kept it for years. But eventually you realized the letter itself didn't matter—what mattered was that their words were completely internalized, part of how you think. The physical object became unnecessary.