Give him this money and these notes, Reynaldo.
Give Laertes this money and these letters.
Take this money and these letters to Laertes in France.
money letters for laertes
I will, my lord.
I will do as you ask, my lord.
I will, sir.
i will
You shall do marvellous wisely, good Reynaldo,
Before you visit him, to make inquiry
Of his behaviour.
You'll do very wisely, Reynaldo, before you visit him — do this: find out what Laertes is doing, who he spends time with, what his behavior is. But don't ask directly — hint at what he might be doing.
Before you give him the money, find out how he's behaving. Who's he with? What's he doing? But don't ask directly — just hint around.
spy on him find out what he does hint around
My lord, I did intend it.
I understand, my lord.
I get it, sir.
understood
Marry, well said; very well said. Look you, sir,
Enquire me first what Danskers are in Paris;
And how, and who, what means, and where they keep,
What company, at what expense; and finding
By this encompassment and drift of question,
That they do know my son, come you more nearer
Than your particular demands will touch it.
Take you as ’twere some distant knowledge of him,
As thus, ‘I know his father and his friends,
And in part him’—do you mark this, Reynaldo?
Good, very well said. Now listen, sir. First ask what Danes are in Paris— Who they are and how many, what money they have, and where they stay, What circles they move in and how much they spend; then when Through these roundabout questions and probing approach You discover they know my son, come closer to the truth Than your direct questions ever could. Pretend you have some distant knowledge of him, Something like this: 'I know his father and his friends, And I know him somewhat'—do you understand this, Reynaldo?
All right, very good job. Look here, sir. First find out what Danes are in Paris— Who they are, how many, what they have, where they live, What kind of people they're connected to, how much money they spend; then when You figure out through these casual questions and indirect approach That they know my son, you'll get closer to real information Than your straight questions could reach. Just say you kind of know who he is, Say something like, 'I know his father and his friends, And I know him a little'—are you following me, Reynaldo?
good job first ask what danes are in paris who they are, money, where they live work it into casual questions when you learn they know my son you'll find out more more than direct questions just say you know his dad & friends & know him a bit get it?
Ay, very well, my lord.
Yes, my lord.
Good idea.
yes
‘And in part him, but,’ you may say, ‘not well;
But if’t be he I mean, he’s very wild;
Addicted so and so;’ and there put on him
What forgeries you please; marry, none so rank
As may dishonour him; take heed of that;
But, sir, such wanton, wild, and usual slips
As are companions noted and most known
To youth and liberty.
And you might say you know him in part, but 'not well; but if it's the person I mean, he's very wild; he's addicted to this and that'—and then you can make up whatever faults you like, just don't make them so serious that they would destroy his honor. Be careful of that. But such reckless, wild, and common mistakes as are known to be typical of young men who have too much freedom.
You could say, 'Well, I know him a little, but not really well. If you mean this wild guy, he's into all sorts of things.' Then you just make up whatever bad habits you want him to have, but nothing so serious it would ruin his reputation. Just hint at the normal stuff that young guys with too much freedom get up to.
say u know him a little he's wild & into stuff make up habits nothing too serious tho just normal young guy stuff
As gaming, my lord?
Gambling, my lord?
What kind of vices? Gambling?
gambling what kind
Ay, or drinking, fencing, swearing,
Quarrelling, drabbing. You may go so far.
Gambling, drinking, fencing, swearing, fighting, or anything else. Whatever fits your story.
Yes — gambling, drinking, fighting, whatever seems to fit.
drinking fighting swearing anyything
My lord, that would dishonour him.
But my lord, that would shame him.
Won't that damage his reputation?
shame reputation honor
Faith no, as you may season it in the charge.
You must not put another scandal on him,
That he is open to incontinency;
That’s not my meaning: but breathe his faults so quaintly
That they may seem the taints of liberty;
The flash and outbreak of a fiery mind,
A savageness in unreclaimed blood,
Of general assault.
No really, keep it measured in the accusations. You must not add another scandal against him— That he's open to excess; That's not my meaning; but present his faults so subtly That they seem like the marks of freedom; The sudden outburst of a passionate mind, A wildness in uncontrolled blood, The kind of thing that happens to many.
No actually, keep the tone measured when you say it. Don't make another accusation against him— That he's into anything wild; that's not the point. But mention his faults in a really subtle way So they sound like the kind of stuff free young guys do; Like a sudden explosion of passion, Wildness in young blood, The kind of thing anyone might do.
don't add scandal just hint at his faults subtle make them sound like normal young guy stuff sudden passion wild energy everyone does it
But my good lord—
Hold on, my lord—
But sir—
but wait
Wherefore should you do this?
Why would you do this? Don't you understand?
Do you understand the strategy?
understand strategy
The Reynaldo scene is frequently cut in productions because it seems merely comic — an old man losing his thread while explaining a convoluted scheme to a servant. But it earns its place because it tells us something essential about Denmark that the rest of the play depends on: surveillance is not exceptional here, it is the default mode of operation. Polonius doesn't send Reynaldo to spy on Laertes because he has particular reason to distrust him. He does it because this is simply what you do. You deploy a layer of observation beneath every relationship. You construct lies to catch truth. You 'by indirection find direction out.' What makes this genuinely disturbing is that Polonius is not a villain — he's an administrator. His surveillance instinct is bureaucratic, not malicious. And that is precisely what makes Denmark so airless: the watcher doesn't need to hate you to destroy you. He just needs to feel that watching is appropriate.
Ay, my lord, I would know that.
Yes, my lord, I would like to know.
I'd like to understand.
explain please
Marry, sir, here’s my drift,
And I believe it is a fetch of warrant.
You laying these slight sullies on my son,
As ’twere a thing a little soil’d i’ th’ working,
Mark you,
Your party in converse, him you would sound,
Having ever seen in the prenominate crimes
The youth you breathe of guilty, be assur’d
He closes with you in this consequence;
‘Good sir,’ or so; or ‘friend,’ or ‘gentleman’—
According to the phrase or the addition
Of man and country.
Here, sir, is my strategy, and I believe it's justified. By putting these small faults on my son, as if it's just a minor blemish—listen carefully—the person you're talking to, when he's heard about these crimes from the youth you're talking about, will definitely agree with you in this way: he'll say 'Good sir' or 'friend' or 'gentleman'—according to his rank and country.
Here's my strategy, and I think it's smart. When you hint that my son has these small vices, as if it's just a minor problem, the person you're talking to—when he realizes you're talking about someone he knows—will definitely agree with you. He'll say something like 'Yes, my friend' or 'Good sir,' depending on what rank he is.
hint at his faults the person will recognize him they'll agree w u they'll say 'friend' or 'good sir' based on rank
Very good, my lord.
That sounds like an excellent plan, my lord.
Very good, sir.
very good
And then, sir, does he this,—
He does—What was I about to say?
By the mass, I was about to say something. Where did I leave?
And then, sir, does he this—he does—what was I saying? By heavens, I was about to say something. Where did I leave off?
So then he does this—wait, what was I talking about? I had something to say. Where did I stop?
what was i saying? where did i leave off?
At ‘closes in the consequence.’
At ‘friend or so,’ and ‘gentleman.’
At 'when he reacts' or 'at friend or so—'
Something about 'a friend or'—
friend or so
At ‘closes in the consequence’ ay, marry!
He closes with you thus: ‘I know the gentleman,
I saw him yesterday, or t’other day,
Or then, or then, with such and such; and, as you say,
There was he gaming, there o’ertook in’s rouse,
There falling out at tennis’: or perchance,
‘I saw him enter such a house of sale’—
_Videlicet_, a brothel, or so forth. See you now;
Your bait of falsehood takes this carp of truth;
And thus do we of wisdom and of reach,
With windlasses, and with assays of bias,
By indirections find directions out.
So by my former lecture and advice
Shall you my son. You have me, have you not?
At 'he responds to you in this way'—yes, exactly! He will answer you like this: 'I know this gentleman, I saw him yesterday, or the day before, Or then, or then, doing such things; and like you said, He was gambling there, he got drunk there, He had a fight about tennis there'; or perhaps, 'I saw him go into such a house of prostitution'— In other words, a brothel, or something like that. You see? Your false bait catches this fish of truth; And this is how we wise, far-reaching people work— With roundabout routes and slanted approaches, Through indirect ways we find directions out. This is how you'll learn about my son. Do you follow me?
When he gets to 'he responds to you like this'—yes, that's it! He'll say something like: 'I know that guy, I saw him yesterday or the day before, He was around doing whatever; and like you said, He was gambling, got completely drunk, Got in a fight over tennis'; or maybe, 'I saw him go into some house like that'— A brothel, you know, or something. You get it? Your fake information draws out the real truth; That's how smart, well-connected people work— We use roundabout methods and slanted questions, We find real answers through indirect ways. That's how you figure out what my son's really up to. You with me?
so he'll respond like 'i know him saw him gambling drunk fighting tennis' or maybe 'at a brothel' fake info gets real truth we use indirect methods slanted questions to find the answers understood?
My lord, I have.
I understand, my lord.
Yes, sir.
understood
God b’ wi’ you, fare you well.
God be with you. Farewell.
Go on then. Goodbye.
go farewell
Good my lord.
Good my lord.
Sir.
sir
Observe his inclination in yourself.
Watch his inclinations yourself — observe everything.
Pay attention to everything he does.
observe watch evything
I shall, my lord.
I will make sure of that, my lord.
I will, sir.
i will
And let him ply his music.
And let him practice his music.
Let him enjoy himself.
music enjoy
Well, my lord.
I will, my lord.
Yes.
yes
Farewell.
Farewell.
Goodbye.
go farewell
Between Act 1 Scene 5 (Hamlet's encounter with the Ghost) and Act 2 Scene 2 (Hamlet performing madness in public), there is a gap — the audience never sees what happened to Hamlet in the days of solitary reckoning. Ophelia's account in 2-1 is the only fill for that gap, and it is deliberately ambiguous. The Hamlet she describes — disheveled, silent, holding her wrist and studying her face as if memorizing it, then leaving without a word — could be a man in genuine psychological collapse, or a man testing a performance of madness, using Ophelia as his first audience. Crucially, Shakespeare doesn't resolve this. Productions that read the scene as genuine breakdown (the Ghost has shattered him) and productions that read it as tactical (he is already beginning to 'put an antic disposition on') are both supported by the text. The ambiguity is load-bearing: if we don't know whether Hamlet is performing or actually mad, neither does anyone else in the play — including Hamlet.
How now, Ophelia, what’s the matter?
What is it now, Ophelia? What's the matter?
Ophelia, what's wrong? What's happened?
what's wrong ophelia?
Alas, my lord, I have been so affrighted.
Oh my lord, I've been so terrified!
Oh Father, I'm so scared!
scared terrified frightened
With what, in the name of God?
What is it, in God's name?
What happened?
what's wrong?
My lord, as I was sewing in my chamber,
Lord Hamlet, with his doublet all unbrac’d,
No hat upon his head, his stockings foul’d,
Ungart’red, and down-gyved to his ankle,
Pale as his shirt, his knees knocking each other,
And with a look so piteous in purport
As if he had been loosed out of hell
To speak of horrors, he comes before me.
My lord, as I was sewing in my room, Lord Hamlet came before me with his doublet completely unbuttoned, no hat on his head, his stockings dirty and fallen down to his ankles, his face as pale as his shirt, his knees shaking against each other, and with a look so horrible, as if he had just escaped from hell to describe horrors.
Sir, I was sewing in my room when Hamlet came in looking absolutely terrible. His shirt was completely unbuttoned, he had no hat, his stockings were filthy and falling down around his ankles, he was pale as a ghost, his knees were shaking, and he looked like he'd just crawled out of hell.
hamlet came to my room his shirt was unbuttoned no hat, stockings falling pale & shaking looked like hed escaped hell
Mad for thy love?
Mad from love for you?
Is he going crazy because of you?
love crazy for you
My lord, I do not know, but truly I do fear it.
I don't know, Father, but I truly fear it is.
I don't know, but I think so.
i think so i'm scared
What said he?
What did he say to you?
What did he do?
what did he do say
He took me by the wrist and held me hard;
Then goes he to the length of all his arm;
And with his other hand thus o’er his brow,
He falls to such perusal of my face
As he would draw it. Long stay’d he so,
At last,—a little shaking of mine arm,
And thrice his head thus waving up and down,
He rais’d a sigh so piteous and profound
As it did seem to shatter all his bulk
And end his being. That done, he lets me go,
And with his head over his shoulder turn’d
He seem’d to find his way without his eyes,
For out o’ doors he went without their help,
And to the last bended their light on me.
He grabbed my wrist hard, then stepped back to arm's length away from me, and with his other hand over his forehead, he just stared at my face as if he was trying to draw it. He stood like that for a long time. Then he shook my arm a little, and moved his head up and down three times, and let out a sigh so pitiful and profound that it seemed to shatter his whole body and end his life. After that he let me go, and turning his head over his shoulder, he seemed to find his way without using his eyes, because he went out the door without looking, but the whole time his eyes stayed fixed on me.
He grabbed my wrist really hard, then stepped back to arm's length and just stared at my face like he was trying to memorize it. He stood there like that for a really long time. Then he shook my arm a little and moved his head up and down three times, and let out this desperate sigh like it was destroying him from the inside. Then he just let me go, turned around, and walked out without even looking where he was going, but he kept his eyes on me the whole time.
he grabbed my wrist hard stepped back & stared at my face stood there forever shook my arm & sighed like it was killing him let me go walked out watching me
Come, go with me. I will go seek the King.
This is the very ecstasy of love,
Whose violent property fordoes itself,
And leads the will to desperate undertakings,
As oft as any passion under heaven
That does afflict our natures. I am sorry,—
What, have you given him any hard words of late?
Come, go with me. I will go find the King. This is love's madness, a state that destroys itself through its violent nature and drives people to do desperate things, just like any powerful emotion that affects human nature. I'm sorry—have you said anything harsh to him recently?
Come on, let's go find the King. This is what love-madness does—it destroys itself and makes people do crazy, desperate things, just like any strong emotion can affect people. I'm sorry—have you said anything mean to him lately?
this is love-madness it makes ppl do desperate things have u been mean to him
No, my good lord; but as you did command,
I did repel his letters and denied
His access to me.
But Father, remember? You commanded me to avoid Hamlet, and I've been doing exactly that.
But remember — you told me to stay away from him, and I did.
i obeyed avoided him your command
That hath made him mad.
I am sorry that with better heed and judgement
I had not quoted him. I fear’d he did but trifle,
And meant to wreck thee. But beshrew my jealousy!
It seems it is as proper to our age
To cast beyond ourselves in our opinions
As it is common for the younger sort
To lack discretion. Come, go we to the King.
This must be known, which, being kept close, might move
More grief to hide than hate to utter love.
That's what made him go mad. I'm sorry I didn't pay better attention and observe him more carefully. I was afraid he was just playing with your feelings and meant to hurt you. But curse my suspicion! It seems it's just as natural for people my age to make hasty judgments as it is common for young people to lack good judgment. Come, let's go to the King. This must be revealed, because hiding it might cause more harm than revealing that he loves you.
That's what drove him mad. I'm sorry I didn't pay closer attention to him and really observe his behavior. I thought he was just toying with you and trying to hurt you, but I was wrong. We older people jump to conclusions just as much as young people act without thinking. Let's go tell the King. This has to come out, because keeping it secret might do more damage than letting people know he loves you.
that drove him mad i was wrong about him we need to tell the king keeping it secret does more harm than saying he loves u
The Reckoning
The scene does two things at once. In the first half, Shakespeare shows us exactly how Polonius's mind works — he is not just a foolish old courtier, he is a professional spy, and the instructions he gives Reynaldo (spread rumors, watch for reactions, catch the truth in the nets of lies) reveal that this is simply how he moves through the world. It is comic because Polonius loses his own thread; it is chilling because it is second nature to him. Then Ophelia enters and everything shifts: her description of Hamlet — disheveled, pale, holding her wrist, staring, sighing, leaving in silence — is the only window we get into what has happened to Hamlet between the Ghost's revelation and now. We don't see him; we see his aftermath in the face of a woman he's frightened half to death. Polonius immediately processes it through his framework: love-madness, and a political asset. He will tell the King.
If this happened today…
A mid-level intelligence operative sends a junior analyst to a foreign city with instructions to befriend someone's acquaintances, drop subtle rumors about that person's habits, and see who flinches. Somewhere between instructions three and four, the operative loses his own thread. Meanwhile his daughter arrives, visibly shaken: her ex-boyfriend had appeared at her door, looked through her like a ghost, and left without speaking. The operative's immediate response is not concern. It is: 'I can use this.'